Thursday, February 25, 2010

Doomed from the Start: The Myth of Limited Constitutional Government in America by Thomas DiLorenzo

Doomed from the Start: The Myth of Limited Constitutional Government in America by Thomas DiLorenzo--This Tom DiLorenzo article is an absolute must-read. Do yourself a huge favor and read this outstanding article.

It begins:

After spending a lifetime in politics John C. Calhoun (U.S. Senator, Vice President of the United States, Secretary of War) wrote his brilliant treatise, A Disquisition on Government, which was published posthumously shortly after his death in 1850. In it Calhoun warned that it is an error to believe that a written constitution alone is sufficient, of itself, without the aid of any organism except such as is necessary to separate its several departments, and render them independent of each other to counteract the tendency of the numerical majority to oppression and abuse of power (p. 26). The separation of powers is fine as far as it goes, in other words, but it would never be a sufficient defense against governmental tyranny, said Calhoun.
Moreover, it is a great mistake, Calhoun wrote, to suppose that the mere insertion of provisions to restrict and limit the powers of the government, without investing those for whose protection they are inserted, with the means of enforcing their observance, will be sufficient to prevent the major and dominant party from abusing its powers (emphasis added). The party in possession of the government will always be opposed to any and all restrictions on its powers. They will have no need of these restrictions and would come, in time, to regard these limitations as unnecessary and improper restraints and endeavor to elude them . . .
The part in favor of the restrictions (i.e., strict constructionists) would inevitably be overpowered. It is sheer folly, Calhoun argued, to suppose that the party in possession of the ballot box and the physical force of the country, could be successfully resisted by an appeal to reason, truth, justice, or the obligations imposed by the constitution (emphasis added). He predicted that the restrictions [of government power in the Constitution] would ultimately be annulled, and the government be converted into one of unlimited powers. He was right, of course.
This is a classic statement of the Jeffersonian states rights position. The people of the free, independent and sovereign states must be empowered with the rights of nullification and secession, and a concurrent majority with veto power over unconstitutional federal laws, if their constitutional liberties are to have any chance of protection, Calhoun believed. The federal government itself can never, ever be trusted to limit its own powers.
How did Calhoun come to such conclusions? One answer to this question is that he was a serious student of politics, history, and political philosophy for his entire life, and understood the nature of government as much as anyone else alive during his time. He also witnessed first hand or quickly learned about the machinations of the sworn enemies of limited constitutional government in America: men such as Alexander Hamilton, John Adams, John Marshall, Joseph Story and Daniel Webster. (Read the rest here.)

No comments:

Post a Comment